Showing posts with label safety security. Show all posts
Showing posts with label safety security. Show all posts

Monday, 20 October 2008

Member Care and Member Tear

Orwell in October--Part 2
We are exactly the people and organisations we have become.


[Animal Farm and 1984] can be read…as a strong preventive medicine against the mentality of servility, and especially against the lethal temptation to exchange freedom for security; a bargain that inevitably ends up with the surrender of both…
Christopher Hitchens, 2003, Introduction.

**Servility is a dysfunctional form of the servanthood extolled in the New Testament.
**Exchanging freedom for security is a dysfunctional form of laying down one’s life extolled in the New Testament.

Both involve the loss of the rights and responsibilities:
to speak and think freely
to tell the truth and to be told the truth
to require accountability and to request change.

Servility and the loss of freedom dehumanise us.
They necessitate self-deception and other-deception.
Organisations/groups tainted with such dysfunctions and which remain unchecked, increasingly become unsafe places to work.
Ultimately, these dysfunctions tear the members apart.
Let's call it Member Tear.
How endemic and/or epidemic is this in the mission/aid sector?
***
Animal Farm
Note: The context for the next five paraphrased quotes involves naivete, manipulation, and lies:

1. "Loyalty and obedience are more important than bravery."
2. "You have probably only dreamed these things, comrades.
…the animals were content to think that they had made a mistake in their thinking."
3. "I can't believe that this would happen here on our farm. I don't get it. We must be wrong. I am just going to have to work harder to solve this."
4. "The animals were one again bewildered, but with the able convincing of Squeeler they once again believed that it was their own memories that were faulty."
5. "It was easy to prove to the other animals that there was plenty of food, in spite of the actual appearances."
***
And now the ending of Animal Farm:
"Twelve angry voices were shouting, each of them like the other…pig shouting at man, and man shouting at pig, and pig at man again; but it had already become impossible to tell them apart. "
*
Reflection and Discussion
**The essence of Member Tear is to distort the truth in a way that hurts others. Comment on this assertion.

**Pigs become humans and humans become pigs. For Orwell, this means that people can and do have the propensity to become evil and exploit others. Comment on why this propensity—Member Tear-- might be hard to understand, accept, and to change.
*
Note:
"[Animal Farm, published in 1946] is an allegory in which animals play the roles of the Bolshevik revolutionaries and overthrow and oust the human owners of a farm, setting it up as a commune in which, at first, all animals are equal. However, class and status disparities soon emerge between the different animal species. The novel describes how a society's ideologies can be manipulated and twisted by those in positions of social and political power, including how a utopian society is made impossible by the corrupting nature of the very power necessary to create it." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_Farm

Monday, 21 May 2007

Ethics and Protecting Staff At-Risk

A ship in a harbor is safe. But that is not what ships were made for…
*****
*****add your comments below*****

When is it appropriate--ethical--to send workers into risky areas?
These would be locations where the social/political situation is very unstable, where there is the possibility of death or serious physical/emotional injury in the course of helping others, and/or more isolated places where there are few supportive member care resources available.


Workers who serve in cross-cultural settings are often subject to a variety of extreme stressors. Natural disasters, wars, sudden relocation, imprisonment, sickness, and protracted relationship conflicts are but a few of the examples. The general consensus seems to be that sending groups that deploy their people into potentially adverse situations have an ethical responsibility to do all they can to prepare and support them. This thinking is in line with Principle 7 from the People in Aid Code of Best Practice (2003) which states, “The security, good health and safety of our staff are a prime responsibility of our organisation."

http://www.peopleinaid.org


*****
What do you think?

Leave a comment by clicking on "comments" below.
Here are two addditional perspectives/quotes.

1. "Effective pre-mission training must begin with instilling awareness of the need for security and psychosocial support in the culture of organizations. Patched together, ad hoc, or solely programatic efforts will have only minimal impact. Security and support must be integrated, both structurally and functionally, into the mainstream of pre-field mission operations: mission planning, staffing, and budgeting."
**Yael Danieli (Editor), Sharing the Front Line and the Back Hills (2002), p. 383

2. "We have had to ensure that our philosophy of member care, along with our crisis and contingency management approach, respect what God asks of our workers, even though they sometimes go against the prevailing attitude of “safety, security, and reduction of stress levels at all costs,” that is characteristic of many Western cultures. Although no…worker morbidly…desires others to go through pain…or suffering, we have come to realize that such experiences, according to Scripture and history, normally accompany the spread of God’s kingdom."
**Steve and Kitty Holloway, Responsible Logistics for Hostile Places, Doing Member Care Well (2002), p. 447